Everyday since I remember, I have heard the same ideas repeated over to myself, to other people via books, word of mouth, subconsciously or consciously, that XYZ people are bad. For instance, I am Muslim and a Pakistani, I had this idea almost drilled into me that Hindus and Indians are bad, United States is out to get me and Jews are the enemy. Not that someone actually told me this, but it was there in the books, it was there subtly in the stories told by the elders and it was pronounced when people talked about politics at the dinner table.
So in our naive minds, all Hindus initially did turn out to be people who threw away their utensils if a muslim had used them, Sikhs turned out to be only balvaees (the people who did massacre during partition) and Indians were the ones who took kashmir from us, similarly US were the people who were anti-Pakistan and hence bad..they also helped Israel and hence they were bad. Same went for kids on the other side of the world in whose opinion muslims were the terrorists and fanatics and the third world dint have much rights and the muslims were out toget them as well. Unfortunately in a kid’s mind, a country’s foreign policy and the people of its country can be intermingled. For a very long time, I was wary of jews, and then I came to university and all my friends turned out to be jews and caucasians and they also figured that I wasnt a terrorist in any aspect
.
However, this hatred and this bigotry is fed to us, so much so that it becomes part of our nature. and as the days are passing, unfortunately, the world events are only aiding to strengthen these differences and hatred in many minds. I cannot help but wonder why is all this happening, and increasingly so.
Today, before the 9 am meeting, Darrin (my manager) told an interesting research story about diversity. Here is how it went
In 1968, in response to the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr., Jane Elliott, a third-grade teacher in Riceville, Iowa, decided to teach her class about the evils and realities of prejudice and discrimination. Her remarkable, controversial and startling, “Blue Eyes/Brown Eyes” exercise labeled her third-grade participants as inferior or superior based solely upon the color of their eyes and exposed them to the experience of being a minority.
Ms. Elliot began the exercise by asking her class what they thought of people who were different than they were. She asked about people in wheelchairs, people who were black, Native Americans, older people, and other minority groups. The children responded hatefully, mimicking things that they had heard like “They are different and ugly,” and “They smell.” Then, Ms. Elliott asked the blue-eyed children to raise their hands and all the brown-eyed children to raise their hands. She then responded with the “undeniable fact” that all blue-eyed children are smarter than brown-eyed children, cleaner, study harder and are simply better than brown-eyed children. The blue-eyed children immediately felt superior, while the brown-eyed children felt let down and abused.
Ms. Elliott made the brown-eyed children wear green collars for the day, and announced the blue-eyed children would get five more minutes of play time and would have no homework for that day. The brown-eyed children would have to use a cup to get water from the drinking fountain and would have five minutes less for lunch. They were also made to sit together on one side of the class room. That day the children who were once friends picked on and fought with one another. The blue-eyed children scored well on flash card tests, while the brown-eyed children scored substantially lower.
The next day the roles were reversed. Ms. Elliott told the children that she had lied. Brown-eyed children were in fact the superior ones. The collars were switched and the day proceeded as the day before had. This time the brown-eyed children felt superior. They scored higher on tests. The mayhem of the day before was repeated in the fights.
On the Wednesday after each group of children had played the superior and inferior roles, the collars were destroyed and the class was reunited. The children huddled together and explained how the experiment made them feel. Each child attested and confirmed that he or she would try in the future to recognize people who might be different and embrace the differences rather than discriminate against them.
Sometimes I wonder, if this is all because some of us sit on the different side of the classroom
. If so, how sad is the state of the world we live in .. how limited its color palette.
